Parker, Kern, Nard & Wenzel
Legal Updates


AOE/COE Updates: Bakersfield City School Dist. v. WCAB and Dover v. St. Paul Travelers Insurance

By
Megan K. Rogers

Bakersfield City School Dist. v. WCAB (2007) 72 CCC 1191

The Fifth District Court of Appeal determined that an injury sustained by an employee acting in response to emergency or other situation, whether classified as rescue, response to emergency, or exercise of common decency, is within course of employment.

The facts are as follows: Applicant suffered injury to his right shoulder while employed as air-conditioning mechanic for the school district when he observed man running from a police officer. Applicant was injured while trying to stop fleeing man. Applicant was aware that his job description did not include apprehending suspects fleeing from police, but had been told by his supervisors to be aware of suspicious characters and that he could be used in emergency situations to protect children

The Court found Applicant acted reasonably when engaging in minor deviation from course of his employment to assist police, in light of his perception of danger to schools in vicinity, combined with absence of specific employment policy prohibiting his conduct.

Dover v. St. Paul Travelers Insurance (2006) 35 CWCR 157

If a notice of injury is provided contemporaneously with a notice of termination, the claim is not barred. Typically, if a claim for injury is filed after notice of termination, it is barred. However the purpose of the statute was to prevent claims made in retaliation of layoff. Thus if the claim is made contemporaneously, then it is not barred.

The facts are as follows: Applicant suffered an injury but could not report it the day of because his supervisor had left for the day. The next morning, applicant was taken aside and terminated by his supervisor. At this time, applicant also informed his supervisor of his injury the previous day and the supervisor sent applicant to the medical clinic. An application was filed 9 days later.

A Board panel found that since the notice of termination and notice of injury were done at the same time, the injury was not barred.